I recently read a blog posting by Steve at
Revit OpEd (http://revitoped.blogspot.ca/2012/07/due-diligence.html)
where he “was musing about a recent
conversation where one guy's position was that BIM is hype, unnecessary and
worse really just being foisted upon our profession in a scheme to get more
money from "us"
This got me thinking…
I typically find that people who express
comments like that are both short sighted and closed minded about opportunities
to do what we/you do better.
Yes we can create magnificent architecture
with a pencil but should we?
Personally I find that in the region that I
work (Western Canada) we talk about BIM but we are still not fully embracing
BIM, we say were using BIM technology but basically all we have done is replace
ACAD with RAC… this is not true BIM, it’s Lonely BIM!
We still hand over a set
of drawings to the contractor, not a building information model (unless we are legally obligated too). We coordinate with other BIM
lonely consultants but there is still resistance to sharing a complete model…..Why?
Are we afraid of Liability? Responsibility? Do we not have confidence in our
model?
Knowing the people that I work
with, I have absolute trust in the ability in the technicians creating the
model, the information they have been given or gather is true and correct given
the usual parameter that we work within. Which are the same parameters that we
have worked under for many, many years.... so why the fear? Maybe it’s because
we haven’t done enough to educate those members of a firm who make these kinds
of decisions on the capabilities of BIM and Revit?
Integrated Project Delivery may be the
saviour in regards to this, if everybody associated in a project signs a piece of
paper (simplified here I know)
stating that they wont sue each other everyone involve would be more willing to
share information, confident that that if the information may be
incorrect the ramification wont escalate to a legal scrimmage. This of course
does not reduce the responsibility of ensuring that the information you are
passing on is as correct as you can possibly make it. This is called due diligence!
We need to be more confident in our
capabilities and the capabilities of the people whom we place in roles of
responsibility.
Once this is achieved I believe we will
move forward and create true “responsible” Architecture, or "Ethical Architecture"!
Sc
No comments:
Post a Comment